Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 03:23
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is parental involvement in their daughters' marriages beneficial? Why or why not?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Are there any more 'nun' jokes?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Dopamine Neurons Map Future Rewards, Not Just Past Ones - Neuroscience News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Dejected Joshua Kimmich reacts to Germany’s Nations League defeat - Bavarian Football Works
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Have you ever been a victim of gaslighting? What happened?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Measles leaves children vulnerable to other diseases for years - Our World in Data
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Carbon capture method mines cement ingredients from the air - Tech Xplore